

Need a gym
Lower Body Solution
Great Book!

My favorite of all my Photoshop 4 library of books.
A Great Book for the experienced PhotoShop user!If you are looking to add something special to your portfolio but dont have any ideas this book might be the one for you!
Excellent Photoshop special effects book

Leaders should follow the guidance in this book.Corporate titans and politicians who would like to be statesmen ought to read this book and heed the lessons offered.
Long Live the King! The King Is Dead! Long Live the King!Even the companies that work in this area can be unprepared. A young CEO may suddenly jump to another company (as Ray Gilmartin did from Becton Dickinson to Merck), die unexpectedly of a heart attack (as Jerry Junkins did at Texas Instruments), or fail to perform to the board's expectations (as has happened to many companies). Couple that with the fact that irresistible forces may mean that the style that worked well in the past won't wash any more, and apparent succession preparation can equal being totally clueless.
The authors are headhunters with Spencer Stuart and share what they learned in interviews during 1996 and 1997 at Met Life, Caterpillar, Hewlett-Packard, Mobil, Continental Grain, SmithKline Beecham, Delta, Mellon Bank, Bestfoods, Foster Wheeler, Hercules, and GTE. They also interspace other examples. One of the difficulties with a book like this is that things don't always turn out as they seem. A lot of praise in the book goes into Coca-Cola's preparation for the unexpected death of Roberto Goizueta. Douglas Ivester is quickly invested, which is where the book ends. But we know that he also was almost as quickly divested as he turned out to be a poor replacement. This replacing CEOs is a tough business. As irresistible forces become stronger and more volatile, replacements will probably occur even more frequently.
The book concludes that 10 key practices are required: Have a strong, involved board; continually expose the top management team to the board; encourage the next generation of CEO prospects to get early experience with outside boards, the media, and the financial community; create an active executive or operating committee so more executives get exposure to an overview of the company, its strategy and issues; do succession planning on an on-going, real-time basis; take as much human drama out of the process as possible (it's especially hard on number twos); tie some of the CEO's compensation to succession planning and progress; have the directors be paid in stock and make additional investments in the company's shares; calibrate the internal candidates with external ones; and develop a culture that encourages succession (a la Built to Last).
So much for the summary. Here are the problems. Although this book purports to be a best practice book, it does not investigate enough companies to succeed. This is actually a limited survey of practices, with picking out some that seem to work better. To be accurate, such a survey would have had to consider in equivalent detail at least 400 companies. A handful won't cut it.
Second, they have to measure of success in succession. They obviously like some better than others. Without some success measure, you cannot pick out best practices.
Third, the book plugs a service that appears to be from Spencer Stuart in callibrating internal and external candidates. To me, that made the book read like a virtual ad rather than a book about management practices.
Fourth, the audience spoken to was mostly boards and CEOs. There are a lot of other stakeholders out there, like customers, employees, suppliers, distributors, and the communities the companies serve. Shouldn't their reaction be considered in deciding which successions work well and which do not?
I could go on, but you get the idea. The authors needed someone to help them design a methodology before they started. Without one, they have produced a book, and some of what it says seems to make sense. With an appropriate methodology, I am sure they could have produced a much better book.
If you want more information on the subject, your best source in my opinion is to read the case studies in Directors & Boards, a magazine devoted to corporate governance. The material I have read in that magazine is consistently superior to what is in this book.
Good luck in overcoming your disbelief stall that people who recruit CEOs should know how to determine best practices in the area of CEO succession.
Packed With Knowledge!

Light and easy readThis book is a good overview, but at less than 200 pages only skims the surface of what makes Target. The author takes a very positive view, which may be entirely appropriate given the success of the company and the upstanding Dayton family. However, there were certainly challenges, mis-steps, and successes that went in to building the brand and the stores that could have gone much further in understanding the company.
A must read for industry watchers, and an enjoyable read for customers or suppliers. Not the definitive analysis of what or who makes Target what it is.
Interesting look at an interesting companyAnyways, short (only 200+ pages), but current, book written in a rather dull way. Spotlights Target's generosity and caring but also casts light on the continued problems concerning under-paid overseas labor. Rent it from the library or buy it used.
Rowley is ON TARGET with this book!

Not for Beginners
One of the Best Illustrator "how-to's" aroundInspiring projects, of which you probably would need to know the program before tackling them.
I'm only surprised and disappointed that these two excellent authors, Janet and Linnea have not done a revise as Adobe Illustrator 8 is way new and greatly improved since 1995. Hence only 4 stars, but 5 thumbs up if they ever released a revise!
If you're looking for projects to do, and you know your way around Illustrator, this is a great book to pick up for your library.
Practical step-by-step projects in Adobe Illustrator

The Making of America's Bosnia Policy
How the United States Got Involved in Bosnia

Guide to post-Dayton Bosnia

Contemporary Edited Compilation of the Scopes Monkey Trial

Starfleet's Engineering Corps deserve better...This book is useful essentially to illuminate everything that is wrong with STAR TREK fiction and is what happens when fanboys get to write drama. They forget that they are writing drama in leiu of simply throwing a lot of one-dimensional characters out there and jamming in a bunch of trivia.
Plotlines from half a dozen STAR TREK episodes are awkwardly jammed into the story as exposition. Most are unecessary. (I supppose someone has to remind readers how Scotty got to the 24th century) All have the light touch of a sledgehammer to the skull.
The characterizations in Interphase are laughably cardboard. They have no human depth to them. They exist only as stiff archetypes lacking any sort of subtlety. The writers' main idea of character development seems to be tacking on little ethnic eccentricities to the players in the story, like Captain Gold, who radiates his Jewishness by throwing out phrases like "schmeer" and "the whole meggilah." This is disturbing not from a racialist aspect, but simply because it's so painfully obvious.
What's actually a shame is that the main plotline is actually kind of interesting. The crew is sent out on a mission to salvage the U.S.S. Defiant at the invitation of the Tholians. Those of you may remember the TOS episode "The Tholian Web" where the U.S.S. Enterprise was sent to find out what happened to the Defiant (one of the "original 13" Constitution class vessels. The other 11 being; the Constitution, the Constellation, the Lexington, the Hood, the Intrepid, the Ark Royal, the Discovery, the Kitty Hawk, the Valiant, the El Dorado and the Saratoga. HAH - TAKE THAT FANBOY!) It's a good base for a story. It touches back to familiar territory. It has the mystery potential surrounding the fate of the Defiant. Intrigue with the Tholians. Unfortunately, it just never really comes together.
There is one character in the story that sparks interest. The 3rd in command of the SCE vessel (I'm assuming some sort of warp tender) is not of a personality suited to command. A gregarious sort, who uses humour as a social lubricant, he is popular, but not a "command guy." I know this personality well. But in the end, though a refreshing change from the "heroic" personality, he too is merely a "type," who in the end, will, as if by magic, fulfill the fanboy dream of shedding the nebbishy exterior and becoming "command guy."
Anyone who feels like reading STAR TREK fiction would be much better served by picking up John Ford's The Final Reflection. Still the best STAR TREK novel ever published.
No Star Trek books for 5 years, and I come back to this?The story follows a crew of an SCE ship, trying to recover the USS Defiant out of the rift it fell into back in Kirk's day, with the Tholians added to make things interesting. The story tries to tie up the loose ends left by the original series episode.
As far as stories go, it's not terrible. For a Star Trek novel, it's fairly decent. The characters are sort of believable, and the writing is tollerable. It has a clever plot, and one that fits in quite well with the establish Star Trek Universe.
That said, I see no reason why the two parts of this story couldn't have been condenced into one book. Niether part is very long. not even long enough, to qualify as a novella, much less a novel. Someone pulled a fast one of their customers here.
If you're the type of person who read Star Trek, you might like this one, but otherwise? Don't bother.
Nice follow-up to the TOS episodeThis S.C.E. e-book series is a good read. I would say "page-turner", but it's more of a "page-clicker". I'll be keeping track of this series, and buying more as they come out.
